You realize that asylum seekers from Haiti, for example, would be very concerned to be interviewed by this board member, especially since they would not even have any appeal available. As you know, and we already discussed this, it is impossible in Canada to appeal a decision since, despite what the act says, the Refugee Appeal Division has still not been created. Ultimately, even if there is a majority of good board members, from time to time one who is more questionable slithers in.
Does this not illustrate the importance of establishing a full-fledged refugee appeal division?