You have a safe third country agreement that has nothing to do with what's in the bill—we agree that's completely different. Under that agreement, if you go to the United States, for example, given that your country is a signatory to the Geneva Convention, you make your claim in the United States, and then you're taken back, unless there's an exception, for example if we don't have the same foreign policy as certain countries and there are exceptional measures. That is the agreement that was reached with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees at the time, and that I negotiated.
In the same way, if we wanted a global visa, we wouldn't have to change the policy if the main goal of the bill was a focus on process and selection of well-founded appeals, and also, if you were already able through regulations to create an orderly system or flow of people.