I'm still concerned, because consumer protection for me is about accountability of a professional--discipline, education, qualifications, and penalties--and actually supervising the profession.
The Law Society of Upper Canada, for instance, is responsible for someone who hangs up a shingle and is not a lawyer. It's actually the Law Society that can prosecute. CSIC cannot prosecute someone who hangs up a shingle and acts outside the law. That has to be done by someone else. So consumer protection is actually not embedded in CSIC. Only part of it is, and that's the professional accountability part, not the penalties.
Is that a bother to you?