We'll see how the votes go. I would have preferred, and I still prefer, that we continue along the lines of the recommendation passed by the Committee in 2008—in other words, a formal transfer of this responsibility to the Quebec government, so that we can ensure that all the requirements with respect to Quebec consultants are met.
That said, I understand that the intent behind this amendment, combined with the Minister's amendment, is to ensure harmony. But I don't think that is enough. The intention is certainly completely legitimate, but I think this could have been more clearly expressed in the legislation, particularly with respect to the obligation to inform people that you are not accredited by the Quebec government. That could have been specifically stated in the legislation, rather than leaving it to the Minister.
I am very much aware of the fact that I probably do not have majority support around this table, so I see no point in unduly prolonging the debate.