Well, I know, but you've actually said that temporary people are not nearly as good or as qualified as the full-time people and that we shouldn't actually use the temporary system because it in fact delays the process. They all have to be trained, and at the same time they aren't able to do more than, as you've just said, nibble at the backlogs.
This is the difficulty. You have ministry officials who are paying attention to what you are saying today. If the temporary program doesn't work and you don't like it, just say you don't and I'm sure the ministry, even though they would like to try to get these reductions down and even though they would like to try to use a little bit of extra end-year money that they find to try to reduce the backlog...you have come here and said it's worthless or it shouldn't happen.
I appreciate the fact that Mr. Eyking is here, but who is he supposed to defend, as the MP? Is he supposed to defend the fact that temporary individuals are actually given an opportunity to earn additional income, to earn the opportunity to prove themselves in the ministry, or to earn the opportunity to potentially be hired full-time? Or should we just do away with the program?