Thank you very much.
I want to thank His Excellency and every other presenter who is here. I think it's very courageous of all of you to give up this much time to face a committee across the great waters.
Just for the record, Canada does recognize members of the Roma community as convention refugees. In the 2011 country report we received the other day, 165 applicants from Hungary were accepted by the IRB, compared to 117 from North Korea. The numbers being withdrawn or abandoned in 2011 actually went from 95% previously right down to 55%. I just want to put that out there, because as Canadians we have recognized that they are refugees who are deserving of that designation.
We've also heard information regarding Roma and EU countries. His Excellency made it very clear that there are no asylum seekers from member states within the European Union.
We have also heard a lot about this free movement of people within the EU. Why do they have to travel on dangerous boats or by plane to come to Canada? Why can't they just go to a nearby country? The right of location within the EU is really limited. For example, you can move somewhere, but after three months you have to have a job. You stipulated that.
We also know and have heard reports that there's a high level of prejudice against Roma in EU countries, and they're finding it hard to find jobs. Plus the economy doesn't help. Mass deportation of Roma from France in 2010 was also another indication of the kind of persecution they face.
Why do EU countries refuse to accept that some Roma fleeing Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia could be refugees, when other countries such as Canada have officially ruled that numerous Roma are indeed convention refugees?