Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm sorry, but I have to go back to these definitions one more time. It's interesting that you keep referring to “act of war” and how it would be better described as “armed conflict”. I actually searched to see if I could find an internationally acceptable definition of “act of war”, and I couldn't. I found other things: armed conflict, nations normally at peace, aggressive acts, provoking a war, and so on.
I think the consensus from you, if you would agree, is that we need to clearly define what we mean by “act of war”, whether it's an alternative definition or something clearly spelled out. Is that what you're stating?