That is a very difficult question: what should the overall appropriate level be? I remember the 1%. The only time I've ever come out against an economic study was in 1990, when the Economic Council of Canada suggested that we move to a 1% target of the population. I don't have an easy answer, but I would emphasize that getting the right mix is probably the most fundamentally important thing that we could do. In considering the labour market earnings of recently arrived immigrants, it's changing the mix that has the largest effect.
If the Canadian government were to expand the economic class share, as it did in the early 1990s, the labour market earnings gaps between newly arrived immigrants and those born in Canada would be much larger than it already is, and it's already quite bad. So I think that keeping the economic class share quite high, at that 60% level, should be an important part of the mixture going forward. Australia's system has about a 70% economic class share, but given our challenges with the backlog in the family and reunification class, I would prefer to keep the range that we're at right now and not deviate from it.