I think that's true. I have very little to add. I think there is a choice here of what you care more about. Do you care more about the idea of marriage fraud, or do you care more about abuse of women?
If you care about marriage fraud, then my next question is this. Does this conditional sponsorship do any better job than the availability of revocation of status for misrepresentation? I don't think there is any evidence in support of the claim that it does, so if we know it does harm and it doesn't confer benefit, that raises a question of what its virtue is.
One more thing to point out here, we already screen overseas spousal sponsorship applications very closely, and as Mr. Karygiannis said, many people are screened out of that overseas, so we already have a mechanism that deals with that.
As for the in-Canada refusals that Mr. Karygiannis referred to—