Thank you for the question. Certainly, it's one of deep interest for me.
Again, as referenced in my notes, when we look at second- and third-tier communities, where perhaps we look at landing stats, we're not necessarily registering as a community that may have had a high critical mass perhaps a few years ago. We see those numbers rising rapidly, but we're often a secondary landing spot, so we're not often captured in terms of landing statistics. When you have fewer numbers, unfortunately one of the challenges with that is that you may not be able to have the types of programs and services in every community that you need to meet the needs. I think when we look at immigrant women in second- and third-tier communities, it becomes that much more complex, that much harder, when we may not have the full robust set of services available to access.
One of the recommendations I would strongly put forward is that when we're looking at the next call around citizenship and immigration, again really look at that mixed service modality to see what it looks like in communities to ensure scalability, to ensure community responsiveness, particularly when we look, for example, at women with very low literacy levels and their opportunity to access language instruction. There may not be enough in the numbers for lower literacy levels, and there may not be a child care program available. What are the other service modalities that we can do? What are the partnerships we can create in order to ensure that those women have the tools they need to ensure that they can integrate? It's critically important for us and more challenging in second- and third-tier communities.