Those deal with cases, as I understand it, that the member was seized with at the time she left the board's employment. The particular claimant and the particular claimant's counsel may not want to have a new hearing start in front of a different member. They may have been satisfied with the way that hearing proceeded. These are not necessarily cases where there was a complaint made about that member, so they're given the option. They can choose which one they prefer, and the board will respect their choice.
On March 20th, 2018. See this statement in context.