What is true is that they do a rigorous test. I'm told by people who have gone through it recently that it's rigorous. What they did, though, was they removed any substantive refugee or human rights law from it. You're doing a rigorous test, but it's more neutral or abstract in terms of the content. That's the problem.
We've never been given the test, so we don't know what it is. I understand that when they first switched to the public service process, they tried doing testing that included substantive refugee law, and a lot of the GIC appointments failed. Then they dropped that.