I don't know if you were provided the annual report. I did send the electronic version.
By way of an example, where there's a complaint and it did not meet the threshold to order a public hearing, it still provides the information that a complainant made a complaint, what kind of court she appeared in, and what the allegations were of what conduct. In this case, for example, the complainant believed that the justice of the peace was unfair, racist, and ignored her and so on. All of that would be set out.
The steps taken by a complaints committee are set out, so it would say that the complaints committee ordered the court transcript or had witnesses interviewed. If it's not dismissed, it will disclose that the justice of the peace was invited to respond. Some information of what they responded would probably be included in the case summary. The disposition is there. The reasons for it are there. If the committee had concerns because of the principles of judicial office that were not upheld by the justice of the peace, that information is there.
This particular case summary that I'm looking at, for example, is about two and a half pages long. It varies by complaint and by complexity of the complaint. If it's a hearing, all of the decisions made by the hearing panel are public. The hearing itself is fully public as well. Basically, the open court principle applies if it's a hearing.