Mr. Chair, with the time I have left, I move:
That, in relation to the Committee's study of the impact of irregular crossing of Canada's southern border, the Committee report its findings to the House and request a government response to that report.
Mr. Chair, we haven't clarified the results of these meetings. Given that there are some fairly significant points that have come up over the last several hours of testimony, including that the government intends to provide additional payments—we don't know how much, when, or what that's projected on—I think it's important for us to summarize the findings of this committee, especially tabling the motion this morning on the cost.
I would ask, Mr. Chair, that this committee put together a formal report based on the testimony we have heard here. I think the role of this committee, even if we can't agree on how, should be to point out to the government that there are some gaps in information that are preventing the public, members of the media, and our provincial counterparts from coming up with policy and planning. I would argue and assert that it is our role as parliamentarians to help define and assess whether government expenditures are appropriate. I don't think we're there yet.
I would be very surprised if my Liberal colleagues would not support the tabling of a report in the House of Commons. To me, a vote against this is really a vote against having a plan. I would really like our committee to support tabling a plan in the House of Commons and asking the government to report its findings to the House as soon as possible.