We've already heard from Ms. Go that family reunification is a pillar of the immigration system. We've heard about individuals who bring in their grandparents and parents, and although those grandparents and parents may not necessarily be contributing directly to the economy, there is a social, intangible aspect. Similarly, as we've heard from the chair, if the child stays in Canada there is intrinsic value. There's an opportunity cost if we lose them, if they return to their home country or go to another safe country. If that child is admitted as a refugee, they will be educated in Canada, and that child does need family support.
I can't think of a single instance where.... We've seen this with our neighbours to the south and their policies, where there are family divisions. I don't know of any children who would stay in the country if they were removed from their families and raised in the foster family system that we have here.
I would say that, obviously, any reasonable person would agree that this is not the right policy. How do we go about having that parent be recognized for their contributions and not have to resort, for example, to H and C applications?