Let's just pause there for a second.
On the one hand, in some of the recommendations provided, you've been suggesting to rescind the safe third country agreement, which would allow people to come to the border and, as the Conservatives would argue, jump the queue. We only have so many settlement services available for people. We're trying to scale up to 1%.
How can you rationalize allowing people to come to the border and take settlement services in a finite resource environment and then also ask for more family class? You don't leave any room for any other type of economic migration, which Mr. Donnelly suggests is what supports public confidence in our system.