Okay.
I think a lot of the motion, from my understanding, could be discussed with.... Many Canadian departmental officials have been working on that particular issue. I think having the minister appear is important. My assumption is that the chair would be arranging witnesses who were from GAC, IRCC, the minister, and perhaps even our rapporteur, Ms. Arbour. I think that was more the spirit behind it. We could easily fill two meetings or more with Canadian officials, which you had already decided, so this isn't about babysitting, as you've characterized it; it's just that we have only one witness here. We have one witness, when we could have had a panel of many other departmental officials and whatnot.
I just find that a poor allocation of time, especially—