I would just note that the spirit of the motion, when we agreed to it and agreed to change the scope of the topic, was not to allow the chair to arbitrarily arrange meetings without having some input into it. Otherwise I would have moved the motion to have it as a separate study.
This is why I find it odd that there wasn't a bit more thought given to planning.
Against my better judgment, I would say, depending on how you answer this, that if you intend, as the chair, to perhaps put together a panel that is a bit more robust than just one person for the remainder of the three-and-a-half meetings, which you have now deemed, I think that's probably more in the spirit of what that motion was. Frankly, this seems like a squandering of the time.