The member is simply trying to take us off on a line of questioning that has nothing to do with supplementary estimates, in an ill-fated attempt to try to.... I don't know what she's trying to do, but she has clearly demonstrated that there is no link to her line of questioning and what we are here to examine, which is the supplementary estimates that have the minister and the officials here in front of us today.
They have already told her they cannot speak, due to privacy laws, based on any individual cases or situations.
I would ask you to rule that, as she continues to try to draw specific individuals in and ask for specific information about specific cases, that is not what the minister is able to do and not what he or his officials are here to do today.