But that's not yet. Okay, that's great.
The other question I have is on the $114 million. From my analysis, that is largely retroactive. Is that right? It is for costs that have already been incurred.
On March 18th, 2019. See this statement in context.
March 18th, 2019 / 4:15 p.m.
Conservative
Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB
But that's not yet. Okay, that's great.
The other question I have is on the $114 million. From my analysis, that is largely retroactive. Is that right? It is for costs that have already been incurred.
See context to find out what was said next.