We certainly looked at that option, along with a range of options, and cost did factor into it. In that scenario, unlike the current one that is proposed, there would be enhanced liability risk for the government, for example, if we're directly regulating the immigration consultants. There is that issue.
There was also a bit of a policy issue around perceived or real conflicts of interest. Currently, the minister is responsible for the organization, which is at arm's length. That's what's proposed in the legislation, but under a direct government regulation you would have the government be both the decider of immigration applications at the same time as regulating the industry. That was also a concern.