I think things would probably go into three buckets on this one. The first one is, as you just mentioned, getting humanitarian access that respects state sovereignty, which can be difficult. Getting access to the individuals in that respect can be very complicated. That can also lead to other complications. If exit permits or that sort of documentation is required from that state, it can be very difficult to get people moved out of it.
Second, there's often the issue of simple logistics and trying to reach the people. It is a conflict zone, so it's often very difficult to reach them. Also, while there are tools that we could sometimes use elsewhere, like video conferencing and so on, to do the interviews, the technology may not be available or it may be broken. That that makes it very difficult as well. It may be difficult for people to get transport in or out, and so on.
The third area is the security of the individuals. Within that, I think, there are three areas I would like to identify. One is the security of the applicants themselves, as you don't want to put them into an even more vulnerable position if it becomes known that there's the possibility of resettlement. The second one has to do with other groups that may need humanitarian assistance, who are not going to be assisted by resettlement, and what happens to them in the aftermath if people are resettled. The third one, of course, is the officials themselves and their security while doing the necessary work in that environment.