I would then invite all of the witnesses to provide additional submissions to the clerk on that issue, on what you think the reform needs to be and how we can overcome these challenges that exist.
The second phase of my question is on the inequities that exist. Given that we have all these crises going on, how do we square this circle then? Can we, for example, keep the generalized priorities that already exist, which the UNHCR already processes? The government, by the way, when they brought in the Syrian refugee initiative, had already identified priorities as well: women, children, families, and the LGBTI community.
The problem that's surfacing right now, particularly, for example, in those streams that have been identified to be priorities, are with the LGBTI community. They have no way of tracking it. In fact, they have no idea how well we're doing on that score.
We need a different mechanism when we know that those individuals are at a particular risk. What can we do to help them make applications and get into the stream, likewise with the Yazidi women and girls and so on?
I won't name all of the groups that have presented, but in that situation, is there something we can come forward with, say in the source countries with these particular groups, that these are specialized programs we would target in that instance to try to address the immediate crisis that our international community is faced with today?
Again, I'll go around the table for quick responses because I think I'm quickly running out of time.
Chantal.