Thank you very much, Mr. Chair, and thank you to all the witnesses.
I think we've reached an interesting juncture in the meetings we're having on the issue of how to address the crises that exist and the great needs that are there.
On the issue of genocide, we heard compelling testimony earlier today about the need for action. How do we deal with groups of women and girls who are enslaved sexually and face horrific circumstances, as an example? We heard also from the Sikh and Hindu communities in Afghanistan about the situation they are in. With regard to the LGBTI community, I believe some 63 countries have declared that it is illegal for someone to have a different sexual orientation. How do we deal with these situations?
On the question of prioritizing, I actually get all the arguments presented here about the inequity of prioritizing and picking out a particular group. Of course, not doing so also means that there are situations where particular groups are singled out and targeted with tremendous, horrific atrocities. How do we solve these problems? I think that is the question before us today.
Source country has been identified for the people who are inland and have no stream within which they can make applications today. Is part of the solution actually bringing back the source country classification?
I wonder if I can get a quick answer from everybody around the table. That's my first question, and I would like a quick answer, because we're limited to seven minutes.