Well, obviously there is. As you see, to be a citizen is to at least have access to basic rights, and it is the case that stateless people don't have that.
As to how to solve this problem, of course I don't have a straightforward answer, but it's interesting, because the 1982 citizenship law in Myanmar itself is not in line with international standards and creates statelessness rather than trying to avoid it. Also, for the Rohingyas it's not just the law itself. There are provisions in this law that would allow Rohingyas to be recognized as citizens, but the problem is the implementation of the law. The way the council of ministers is supposed to take decisions on citizenship has so far never provided any answer. Of course, then, there is a link to vulnerability, as also in terms of refugee movement, which I covered particularly in my presentation. As I said, you can be a refugee, but at least you have a hope to go back to your country, whereas when you are a refugee and stateless as well, this is more difficult.
I have to say that one of the biggest problems in Myanmar is the fact that if a Rohingya is caught in detention, as are those in Thailand, for example, even if they wanted to go back to Myanmar—they shouldn't really have to, because they are refugees, but even if, in some cases, people don't care and just say that they want to get out of detention—Myanmar has systematically refused to readmit any Rohingya.
That means that the problem of indefinite detention is not just in Thailand; it's also in India and in Bangladesh. When governments are not providing refugee status, these people also end up in detention.