As I said, I think the law should be changed. The regulations should be changed back to what they were before when you had to show both that the marriage was entered into primarily for the purposes of acquiring a benefit and that the marriage is not genuine to refuse a marriage.
The reality is, in my opinion, and I think in the opinion of many immigration lawyers, that tools existed to deal with marriage fraud. The marriages that are fraudulent would be found to be not genuine, or if there is a case that slips through, that someone gets here and is subsequently found out, there are provisions, as well, for CBSA to conduct investigations as to whether or not there was misrepresentation in relation to that marriage.
The tools exist. What's happening now is genuine spouses, sometimes with children, are being permanently separated. I don't see what possible policy justification there is for that.