That's precisely the problem, and that's why CAPIC believes there should be a change to allow an immigration officer to look at the circumstances as to why that dependant was not examined, and make a decision. If there was no intent to defraud or to misrepresent—let's talk about children because it's quite often where we see this kind of situation—then the child should be allowed to be a member of the family class in the future.
When there is an intention to commit fraud, I can see it. We have the provisions that allow a case to be revisited under misrepresentation, and people can lose their permanent residency if at some point it is discovered that there was misrepresentation.
I think that the intent initially was to stop people from not declaring children, when the children would make the whole family medically inadmissible. Now it has gone to an extreme where it excludes absolutely anybody for whatever reason.