Just in terms of that, to re-emphasize the point I just made—because we're talking about a motion where we're talking about the scheduling of this study—my intent was to show that in the original motion that was before the House of Commons, no length was given to it. Without looking at the blues, I think that's what I said. If I misspoke, my intent was to say that we have the ability as a committee to say, “Look, let's take this.... Since we weren't prescribed by that motion”—
On June 14th, 2017. See this statement in context.