I have a couple of points. One of the points I'd like to make is it really goes back to what works as a strategy. In the case of the federal experience class immigration program, we can identify the individuals who were admitted under those admission categories and identify whether or not they are more likely to remain in an area where they started out or if they are more highly mobile.
I think the decision about whether to bring the program back would rest heavily on whether it worked in the first place, and it sounds as if you have some evidence to suggest that it did. We can look at the earnings profiles of people under that admission category and whether they stuck around, and if it turns out that this is an effective program, then I do believe it's worthwhile considering bringing it back.
On another point, though, you mentioned in your first question about whether we need to see a shift in immigration policy. We've already had some pretty radical changes in the immigration system, particularly under the previous government. The minister at the time made sweeping changes to how immigration policies are implemented and how they work, and I think it might be worthwhile to take a look at how effective these changes have been.