Thank you very much.
Speaking of recommendations, I would like to know what you are hoping for from our study. Basically, there can be two distinct ways of going about it. Would it be more useful for your work if parliamentarians drafted the broad strokes of the objectives to be achieved, or if we focused a little more specifically on what should change at IRCC? Perhaps you would like it to be a bit of both.
For example, section 179(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations has come up in discussion. If we say that section 179(b) must be amended, that is a specific objective. If we say that issuing visas must be made easier in general, that's a broader objective.
Which of those approaches would you prefer?