I call this meeting to order.
Welcome to meeting number 37 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration.
The Board of Internal Economy requires that the committee adhere to the following health protocols: Maintain a physical distance of at least two metres from others; wear a non-medical mask unless seated, and preferably wear a mask at all times, including when seated; maintain proper hand hygiene by using the hand sanitizers provided in the committee room, and regularly wash your hands well with soap.
As the chair, I will enforce these measures and I thank you all for your co-operation.
Today's meeting is taking place in a hybrid format, pursuant to the House Order of January 25. I would also like to outline a few rules to follow. Interpretation services are available for this meeting. You may speak in the official language of your choice. At the bottom of your screen, you may choose to hear floor audio or English or French. The “raise-hand” feature is on the main toolbar should you wish to speak.
I remind everyone that all comments should be addressed through the chair. When you are not speaking, your microphone should be muted.
The committee clerk and I will maintain a speaking list for all members.
Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the committee on Wednesday, May 26, the committee is resuming its study of the economic imperative and long-term importance for small rural municipalities outside of major cities to retain new immigrants.
I would like to welcome all the witnesses appearing before the committee.
First of all, I'm sorry for the delay. This has been happening especially during the last few days with so many votes. Votes will be happening very soon, whatever time the bells start ringing. I will update you when they do. There might be another vote at 5 as scheduled. Therefore, I just want to inform all members that I suggest that we hear from all six of the witnesses who are scheduled for today for the first and second panels. We will give them five minutes each, and after that we can go into rounds of questioning based on the time we have.
I didn't want to cancel this again because I know that some of the witnesses who are appearing were cancelled once before because of votes.
Is it the will of the committee that we proceed in this way to hear from all of the witnesses and then go into rounds of questioning?