Okay. I think that maybe sometimes, rather than sub-subamending everything, it's more efficient to make sure the chair understands what the general direction of the committee is and to go from there, right?
We could specify it in the language of the motion, but I'm getting the sense that there's a consensus, hopefully, around saying that we should not do this meeting during a regular CIMM committee slot. It should happen during a sitting week, but in an additional time slot so that we're not detracting from the times that have already been set aside for the committee to do its work.
If there's a consensus around that, then we can I think agree by unanimous consent to pull the amendments and adopt the motion.
Is there agreement to direct the chair accordingly?