Right.
My point, though, is that it seems that the argument being used by some is, “Well, we shouldn't have certain provisions that are in this bill because the government could act by ministerial instructions.”
My point is that the government could have acted by ministerial instructions by now and they haven't, and if they want to act by ministerial instructions, one way they could strengthen their case is by moving forward with those actions right away. You're confirming that the government could do so. They could do so in a matter of weeks. However, they have chosen not to.
From my perspective, that strengthens the rationale for legislative measures, because it shows that the government has been unwilling to make some of these changes. That's where you need legislation. It's often when you see the government unwilling to move on something that legislation becomes important, because it requires government action.
I have 20 seconds left. I don't know if you want to comment on that, as opposed to me just sharing an opinion. Do you want to comment on any of that?