Thank you, Madam Chair.
I want to follow up a bit on what was just said and look at the motion that was read earlier here by our colleague. I want to thank Ms. Kwan for bringing up the ATIP and the document that we have.
It's 730 pages, and that's a lot of pages to digest. To my understanding, because the ATIP response is such a large document, there wasn't an opportunity before today to get it translated and sent out to all the committee members. The document is very comprehensive and goes into great detail.
I'm asking all members here if there's a possibility for us to kind of put the motion aside and try to deal with the ATIP process and get it translated so that we can talk about that. As well, as Madam Chair just read, we received this, I think just minutes before the committee, from Christiane Fox, that clearly indicates it's a human error.
In light of these two documents, and as Alexis indicated earlier about the Roxham study, I'm wondering if there's a possibility that because of the two documents—the ATIP and also the letter that Christiane Fox just submitted in French and English that's it's a human error—we could get an opportunity here to absorb this before kind of diving into the motion. Maybe these two documents could enlighten us to maybe change the motion or to make some recommendations related to the motion.
I want to make sure we look at those two documents before we kind of dive into the motion itself. I just want to put that out there and ask if there's a possibility of doing that.
Thank you.