I have looked at it. I think there are other witnesses who, obviously, have stronger personal and, in some cases, professional connections to the subject. I would encourage you to seek out their opinions.
In terms of the overall prioritization of who is and is not becoming a citizen, I would just repeat what I said earlier: If we're talking about maybe 10,000 people who might be affected by something like this, in the last year alone we put through that many citizens in 10 days. The number of lost Canadians, in some sense, is as a result of the dropping desirability of becoming Canadian. That's far larger and, in my mind anyway, a far more pressing priority for the committee and for the Government of Canada to be looking at than a relatively smaller group of people who are clearly suffering personal consequences from this. The fact that we can refer to them by name suggests that the group is, in many cases, small.