Sure. I am doing that—in the context of the bill and whether or not the issues put forward by the author of the bill were respected by the process in expanding its scope. The role of the government in choosing when it should bring in its legislation and insert itself into, perhaps, minor technical corrections and wording—legalese—in a private member's bill versus what's been done to this bill.... It has, in my mind, changed the nature of the bill quite a lot.
When you're in government, as government members know on the other side, you see an area that needs addressing. This area of lost citizens has been something that has been around for a while, and it's clearly something the government could have taken—and should have taken—its own initiative on, to craft it in a way that was not trying to put a square peg in a round hole. Rather, draft it in a way the government could see would work and that would give them the time to set it up properly, change the act and set the systems and everything else up to understand and do the proper consultation in drafting the bill.
That process—I know from my time as a legislative assistant—can be arduous, but the government has been in power for eight years and has had lots of opportunity to do that.