Burden sharing or responsibility sharing is what we're dealing with with the U.S. We're trying to avoid having asylum seekers make multiple claims. I think that's the motivation behind this. It's related to your first question. Standards have to be somewhat similar, but we have to be confident that we can partner with another state, such as the U.S. and maybe other states as well, for some testimony or some questioning to explore other states that Canada would inevitably have to partner with in terms of safe third country agreements.
The idea is that we can agree on standards that are reasonable for all of us and then try to manage forced migration in that sense. I think we are, in a sense, forced to. This is not the nice side of international refugee protection, but the reality is that we're going to have to collaborate, and these responsibility-sharing mechanisms are something we're inevitably going to have to look at more seriously in the future.