I appreciate that answer. It gives a lot more clarity to this question we've been looking at today and especially at our last meeting. This level of detail is really helpful.
I'll go back to the question around the public interest. This, as it's written currently, is quite broad. It leaves a lot of room for discretion, depending upon the cabinet of the day.
Do you think you could fashion this in a way that's still broad but also narrows the scope a bit, for example, with terms like “in exceptional circumstances”? It would be something that clearly narrows the usage, because you did just testify that it would be in very exceptional circumstances, such as a menace to public safety. Mr. Hollmann mentioned public health. COVID-19 is an example. It would be for very exceptional situations.
The way it's written right now doesn't narrowly focus the mind to very exceptional situations. Do you think we could do something to fix that? If you just want to plead the fifth, you can.