We don't really worry about the well-being of Éducation internationale. We worry about the well-being of the skills training network and the employment sector.
I'd start by holding consultations, but 24 hours probably wouldn't be enough. Actually, we need to restore a balance by analyzing labour market needs, and what's going on in educational institutions.
I can't speak to the education system in other provinces, but I can speak to the Quebec education system. Both innovation and labour needs have to be assessed. There's an imbalance that favours post‑secondary institutions, especially universities. There needs to be a more targeted approach, like changing the eligibility criteria for a postgraduation work permit so people have more freedom to follow vocational training, and getting rid of the 900-hour criterion, which we find very subjective.
Personal support worker training, for example, takes less than 900 hours, yet it's one of the trades where needs are critical. There are also a lot of construction trades that require less than 900 hours of training, and there is a huge shortage of workers in construction. These criteria should be reviewed, so that they are less subjective and based on labour market data.
Moreover, there are other inconsistencies in the choices made. Let me give you an example. There are more open work permits awarded to master and doctoral level students over trades students. Why is that?
Also, I'd want Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, or IRCC, officers to be familiar with professional training. Because it's offered at the high school level, and a little different from the rest of the Canadian ecosystem, a lot of administrative errors are being made. Although they meet all the eligibility criteria, some international candidates see their study permit applications denied, simply because the officers processing their applications don't understand what vocational training is.
