Now let's talk about francophone immigration.
You're not the only one to have mentioned it. In fact, again this morning, we saw an article where Evan Green, an immigration lawyer, somewhat reiterates your idea that benchmarks for francophone immigration would ultimately be bad public policy.
You claim that the government decided to increase francophone immigration thresholds for political reasons. In fact, it's quite simply to prevent the French language from disappearing outside Quebec. I spent a year in Saskatchewan, and I can tell you that assimilation is rampant there.
That said, there's this increasing narrative that says that imposing a language criterion would rig the immigration system.
Can you explain that? I need to understand how having a francophone immigration requirement is bad public policy.