I don't think it's necessarily what the governing party has done over the last few years. It's actually the IRB. We, or you, the Parliament, gave it an independent mandate. I have observed the IRB since it was created in 1989, and it's actually taking a lot of these powers. In its procedures, it's going back to the theme we were just talking about a few moments ago. It's interpreting all the norms in, I would say, the most open way possible. That's good and I understand the intentions behind that, but it does lead to complications.
You're highlighting one of them. We have procedures that drag on forever and, obviously, that changes the status of someone. You can't be doing an asylum procedure for three, four, five or six years without acknowledging that the person needs to be integrated into the local community. We've created a system that is, I would say, not sustainable. Parliament should consider the powers it gave to this agency, including changing them, because the models we have around the world are quite different.