I think it was partially successful. Again, the Peel example is a good one. The City of Toronto also got resources through that program. It did go to some places where it was needed. I think the problem was that a lot of the money was wasted on hotels. They were very costly, as Ms. Brennan has already said, and they were also not effective. They're temporary. You cannot register your kids for school if you're living in a hotel. You need some kind of more permanent address. As well, social workers couldn't get in there. Hotel staff are not trained to work with asylum seekers. This was not a good model. It was a very inefficient model.
We already had these non-governmental organizations working across the country. Again, we did research with all of them. Many of them were willing and able to increase their capacity, but they were never asked. That money did not trickle down to the non-governmental sector. It was concentrated mostly within provinces and the municipalities. We didn't think about the other actors that were involved in that space.