You're right, there are a wide variety of issues under this general rubric of land tenure or lands modernization. We would be pleased to come back and discuss these topics with committee members. In fact, it may be best to get back with a bit of a suggested list. I'd hit a few examples and I'll ask my colleagues to add as well.
One of them would be sustainable economic development. It's important to proceed with economic development, but we need to balance that with an appropriate management of the environmental issues. There is a current environmental regulatory gap on reserve for most first nations. That is one subject matter that I would suggest merits consideration.
The second is land tenure itself, the nature of ownership on reserve. As you suggest under lands modernization, there are various first nations groups that are raising for consideration a variety of options. FNLM is an opt-in regime. It would apply only if first nations want to pursue that avenue. Some other first nations are suggesting that there may be a different avenue that would involve fee simple ownership of reserve lands.