A point of order.
Forgive me, but under clause 7 there was an incidental amendment that was not recognized. I wonder if we removed it.
Evidence of meeting #71 for Indigenous and Northern Affairs in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was indian.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Rob Clarke Conservative Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River, SK
A point of order.
Forgive me, but under clause 7 there was an incidental amendment that was not recognized. I wonder if we removed it.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Chris Warkentin
I didn't see it. It has been carried. The bill has been considered and completed.
The clause was defeated, so it's impossible to amend a clause that has been defeated. I didn't see anybody seeking to move an amendment.
Conservative
Rob Clarke Conservative Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River, SK
The question I have here is to Indians off reserve. Under subclause 4(3), which identifies sections of the Indian Act that do not apply to Indians living off reserve, including references to sections concerning wills and estates.... As a result of the defeat of clause 7, which leaves the wills and estates sections 42 to 48 of the Indian Act intact, subclause 4(3) should refer to all wills and estates sections of the Indian Act, namely sections 42 and 52.
I'm just hoping to correct that.
NDP
Jean Crowder NDP Nanaimo—Cowichan, BC
Was that an amendment in the package?
It wasn't an amendment in the package.
Conservative
NDP
Jean Crowder NDP Nanaimo—Cowichan, BC
Do you know which number it was? I don't see it in our package
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Chris Warkentin
I think there is a desire to make an amendment to clause 4, and possibly clause 5, but I'll have our legislative clerk—
Conservative
Conservative
Conservative
Rob Clarke Conservative Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River, SK
It's that Bill C-428 in clause 4 be amended by replacing line 19 on page 2—
Conservative
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Chris Warkentin
It seems to me that if somehow this wasn't submitted or was missed in the process—we'll seek to find that out—it probably has to be amended at report stage in the House, at this point in time.
There is nothing that can be done at this point in committee. It probably has to be done at report stage in the House.
Colleagues, not seeing any additional discussion with regard to future business or any other matter, we will adjourn.
The committee meeting is adjourned.