[Witness speaks in Ojibwa]
I've introduced myself in my language, and what I've said to you is that I am from the Wolf Clan of the Delaware Nation. You know that I'm with the Thunderbird Partnership Foundation, so I won't review that again.
Let me start by saying good morning again, and thank you for the opportunity to inform your study on indigenous suicide.
Many of my comments today are drawn from a paper that we recently commissioned that was authored by Dr. Chris Mushquash and Dr. Jennifer White. It's a paper on life promotion to address indigenous suicide. Why I speak to that is that it offers a strength-based perspective to life promotion, which is a term commonly used by indigenous youth to express their focus in the discourse on suicide prevention.
I'd like to also make a comment about the first nations mental wellness continuum framework, and the indigenous definition of mental wellness.
Let me start off by talking about four key themes that I think are necessary for understanding suicide among first nations people in Canada.
First of all, we have to understand that suicide is not an individual experience resulting from mental illness. Suicide is a direct result of colonization and social inequities, as was communicated by our previous speaker. Suicide among indigenous people in Canada has to be situated within that broad social, political, and historical context that calls attention to the legacy of colonial attempts at assimilation and the ongoing negative effects of social inequities.
Dr. Amy Bombay's research on intergenerational trauma clearly demonstrated that the more familiar history and experience one has with the residential school system, the higher risk there is for mood disorders such as anxiety, depression, and suicide ideation and attempts.
Highlights from the current knowledge base of promising practices for preventing suicide and promoting life among indigenous people must focus on creating conditions for indigenous children and youth, families and communities to flourish. One of the examples I'd like to offer is an early intervention program that we have developed called buffalo riders. It's a school-based early intervention program.
Another example I'd like to offer is from indigenous knowledge keepers who say that life promotion begins before birth with cultural practices that secure the spirit to this physical world. They also say that when we no longer hear the cry of new birth in our communities, the fabric of our communities becomes burdened by the cry of death. It's this cry of death that creates imbalance in the lifespan, the life path, for first nations communities. Speaking of greater attention to the continuum of life and ensuring that there's opportunity for birthing in our own communities, many northern remote and isolated communities, as you may know, require women to leave their communities on their own, even as teens, to give birth in other locations without that support network that they require.
Contributions from published scholarly literature that are specific to indigenous people include things like, as was said, cultural continuity factors; self-government; active efforts to restore land claims; control over education, health care, culture, police, fire services, those types of things; indigenous language; creating a sense of belonging and connection to cultural identity and spirituality; cultural healing practices; connection to family and community; strengthening social capital and support; building infrastructure in our communities, material, human, and information infrastructure; and a reliance on indigenous knowledge to define wellness.
This leads me to the third point that I'd like to make, which is that we have to recognize that indigenous and non-indigenous peoples together, as well as provincial, federal, territorial, first nations, governments, and organizations, have to be actively engaged as part of the solution. But to do this requires a paradigm shift that makes space for indigenous knowledge as evidence, and moves us from a focus on creating solutions or programs and services for individuals to focus on outcomes for families and communities, because when we focus on outcomes, we're going to get to a place that facilitates that conversation on wellness rather than a conversation that's strictly focused on deficits.
Strengths-based, life-generating strategies that honour indigenous ways of knowing and reflect relational, familial, social, and spiritual dimensions of selfhood are more likely to be effective than those predicated on decontextualized, expert-driven, individualistic, biomedical understandings of distress. Even trauma-informed practice, for example, has to be within the context of cultural humility and cultural safety if it's to have long-lasting benefits to wellness.
The fourth point I'd like to make is that we have to emphasize the importance of long-term comprehensive strengths-based and life-promoting approaches that recognize the significance of land and ceremony, again honouring indigenous knowledge, values, spirituality, culture, and our lineage.
Land, lineage, and language are three key factors in identity and wellness. Through a CIHR research project we developed a definition of indigenous wellness defined from indigenous knowledge, and that definition of wellness was also defined with four key outcomes. If we use culture to promote life, to facilitate wellness from a whole-person perspective, the outcomes that we should expect are hope, belonging, meaning, and purpose. These four outcomes have 13 measurable indicators to get us to hope, belonging, meaning, and purpose.
To get to hope, we have to invest in values facilitating connection to belief in world view, identity, to get to the outcome of belonging. It's nurturing that connection to family, community, relationship with land and our ancestors, and having an attitude toward living life within that context of that natural support network. To get to having meaning in life, we have to balance what we know as rational knowledge with intuitive knowledge, which is spirit-driven, and that when we weave the two together, only then do we have a full understanding about the meaning of life. To get to the outcome of purpose, we have to invest in the unique ways of being and doing that are defined by culture and indigenous knowledge, and that create wholeness.
These four outcomes and these indicators are critical for strategic planning, program design, policy, constructing policies, informing service delivery, but most importantly, for ensuring quality in the way that we promote life specifically for young people. The use of the first nations mental wellness continuum framework, which has these four outcomes as its centre, gives us further understanding of a systems approach to life promotion that relies on indigenous knowledge and culture.
I want to finish with four key principles.