Thanks very much, Mr. Battiste.
In consultation—and thank you for having that amendment to us in a timely manner—I am advised that the amendment seeks to make a substantive modification by adding new elements to the preamble.
House of Commons Procedure and Practice—my famous big green book—says on page 774:
In the case of a bill that has been referred to a committee after second reading, a substantive amendment to the preamble is admissible only if it is rendered necessary by amendments made to the bill. In addition, an amendment to the preamble is in order when its purpose is to clarify it or to ensure the uniformity of the English and French versions.
It's my opinion that the proposed amendment is substantive and that no amendment was made to the bill itself to that effect, and that therefore the amendment is inadmissible.
I have Mr. Anandasangaree with his hand up, and then Mr. Battiste.