[Member spoke in Inuktitut as follows:]
ᐋᒻ, ᓯᕗᓪᓕᕐᒥᖅᑲᐃ ᐅᖃᔪᒪᑐᐃᓐᓇᖅᑐᖓ ᓯ53 ᐅᖃᐅᓯᕆᔭᐅᑲᑕᖕᒪᑦ ᐃᖅᑲᐅᒪᓐᖏᑕᓐᓂᒃ ᐅᖃᖅᑑᔮᑲᑕᖕᒪᑕ ᐃᖅᑲᐅᒪᔪᖓᓕᐊᓯᑦ ᓯ53 ᑲᔪᓯᒍᓐᓇᐃᓪᓕᓚᐅᖅᑐᖅ ᐋ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᓐᖏᑦᑐᓂᒃ ᐱᔾᔪᑎᖃᖅᓱᓂ, ᑖᓐᓇ ᐋᒻ, requiring inform consent, ᐃᓱᒪᖅᓱᖅ....ᐃᓱᒪᖅᓱᖅᓱᑎᒃ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᐋᒻ ᑐᑭᓯᐅᒫᓂᒃᓱᑎᒃ ᐊᖏᕈᒪᕐᒪᖔᖅ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᕆᓂᖅ ᑖᓐᓇ ᐋᒻ ᓴᓐᖐᓪᓕᕈᑕᐅᖅᑰᔨᓚᐅᓐᖏᑦᑐᖅ ᐅᕙᓐᓄᒡᓕ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᓇ ᐃᖅᑲᐅᒪᓐᖏᑦᑐᖓ ᑭᓯᐊᓂ ᑖᓐᓇ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᑕᐅᔪᒪᓂᖓ ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑐᕈᑎᒋᔭᕋ ᑕᒪᒃᑮᒃ ᔨ2 ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐋᒻ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕆᐊᒃᑲᓐᓂᕈᑎ ᑖᓐᓇ ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᑕᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑐᕈᑎᒋᔭᒃᑲ, ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑐᓐᖓᕕᒃᓴᐅᒻᒪᑕ ᐋ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᕆᒃᓯᐊᖅᓯᒪᓐᖏᒃᑲᓗᐊᕈᑎᒃ ᑐᓗᖅᑕᕈᑕᐅᓪᓗᐊᖏᑦᑐᖅ ᓯᕗᓂᒃᓴᑐᖄ− ᓗᒻᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐃᒐᓱᒃᑎᓪᓗᑕ ᑖᓐᓇ ᐃᖅᑲᖅᑐᐃᕕᒻᒧᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᐊᕐᒪᖔᖅ ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑕᐅᒐᓗ− ᐊᕐᒥᒃᐸᑦ ᐃᖅᑲᖅᑐᐃᕕᒻᒥᒃ ᑖᓐᓇ ᐃᓛᒃᑰᖓᓂᖓ ᐋᒻ ᓄᖅᑲᕈᑕᐅᒐᔭᖅᑰᖏᒻᒪᑦ, ᐅᖃᕈᒪᑐᐃᓐᓇᖅᑐᖓ ᑖᓐᓇ ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑐᕐᓂᐊᖅᑕᕋ ᓂᕈᐊᕈᑎᒋᓕᕐᓂᕈᑦᑎᒍ, ᖁᔭᓐᓇᒦᒃ.
[Inuktitut text interpreted as follows:]
First, I would like to say that, when Bill C-53 is being referred to, I don't recall what was in it. What I can recall is that Bill C-53 was not able to go through due to different factors with free, prior and informed consent. To me, it doesn't look like it will diminish the strength or make it weaker.
I support the amendments of both G-2 and what's being proposed. I support both of them because, even if they are not clearly defined, they will not create a roadblock. We are trying to plan ahead to the future. I don't know if the courts will need to define this, but even if it's brought forward to the court, I don't think it will be a roadblock.
I will support this amendment once we come to a vote on it.
Thank you.
[English]