Okay, I have limited time. I think I understand where you're going with this.
In those cases, you have an individual who's seeking information about their own history and heritage that they've been separated from. It's still the community that defines that identity. It's just that an individual has been separated from that community.
This question is at the heart of a lot of this issue, because now a lot of people who don't have connections to any kind of community are popping up and trying to take advantage of government programs. I was struck by your comment that the Randy Boissonnault case is complex. I don't think it's complex at all. I think it's very simple.
What do you think is complex on these identity issues about Randy Boissonnault's previous claims around indigenous identity? What's complex there?