Mr. Chair, in our haste to rush the last minute of clause 12 last week, we saw that amendments BQ-5 and LIB-4 both passed. Does that mean that they are both going to be portrayed in the legislation one after the other, or do we understand that “to ensure gender parity on the board” replaces the discussion about equal representation of men and women?
I think the more inclusive language was “gender parity” without actually saying “men and women”, because of trying to be inclusive of people who don't see themselves reflected in any of those comments. I'm trying to get a sense what we did there moving forward in that last frame of BQ-5 and LIB-4.