Very quickly, we do deal with that in two areas in our document.
Number one, the policies show a reluctance to trust first nation governments and first nation governance of lands. The policies need to be more embracing of reconciliation, and need to recognize that self-government has succeeded in Canada. That's issue number one.
Issue number two is that a lot of the first nations who have negotiated self-government agreements have a positive relationship with their neighbours, so a drive to a less confrontational and to a more reconciliation-based approach with a better understanding of the benefits beyond first nations can help accelerate those.
The last point we make in our paper is that a lot of first nations have escaped the antiquated, ineffective Indian Act system of lands management and have gone to our land code system. In order to go to a modern treaty, or to a broader self-government agreement, you have to agree with Canada to renounce the framework agreement and all the work that has been done under it. It's that which we're suggesting is a barrier to moving ahead with self-government.
If first nations want to keep the framework agreement under another self-government agreement, they should have that option, and that would help accelerate things.